Best Tech Pack Software for Fashion Designers in 2026 (7 Tools Compared)

Adstronaut Team · 2026-02-19 · 11 min read

The best tech pack software depends on your production volume, budget, and technical skill level. For indie brands producing fewer than 30 styles per season, AI-powered tools like Adstronaut AI offer the fastest and most affordable path ($3–$5/style, no design skills required). For mid-size brands needing collaboration features and historical spec libraries, Techpacker ($49–$149/month) is the industry standard. For large brands with in-house technical design teams, Adobe Illustrator combined with custom Excel templates remains the most flexible option, though it requires significant expertise.

This guide compares 7 tech pack tools with honest assessments of pricing, strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases.

Table of Contents

Quick Comparison Table

| Tool | Price | Per-Style Cost | Speed | Skill Required | Best For | |:--- Fashion designer evaluating tech pack software on dual monitors showing technical sketches and measurement tables

Fashion designer evaluating tech pack software on dual monitors showing technical sketches and measurement tables |:---|:---|:---|:---|:---| | Adstronaut AI | Credit-based | ~$3–$5 | 5–15 min | None | Indie brands; speed-critical | | Techpacker | $49–$149/mo | $4–$15 (at volume) | 30–60 min | Low | Teams; collaboration | | Illustrator + Excel | $23/mo | $0 (your time) | 2–8 hrs | High | Full creative control | | Techpack.co | $29–$99/mo | $3–$10 (at volume) | 30–90 min | Low | Budget; simple garments | | CLO 3D | $50–$100/mo | N/A (3D focused) | 2–4 hrs | Very High | 3D prototyping | | Browzwear | Enterprise pricing | N/A | Variable | Very High | Large enterprises | | Free templates | Free | $0 | 2–6 hrs | Medium | Zero budget startups |

1. Adstronaut AI — Best for Speed and Cost {#adstronaut-ai}

How it works: Upload a photo of your garment. AI generates a complete tech pack including flat sketch, BOM, measurements, construction details, and grading — exportable as a factory-ready PDF.

Pricing: Credit-based system; approximately $3–$5 per complete tech pack.

Strengths:

  • Fastest method available (5–15 minutes per complete pack)
  • No design software or technical skills required
  • AI-generated flat sketches from photos eliminate the Illustrator barrier
  • Includes integrated tools for photoshoots, color changes, and fabric swapping
  • Best cost-per-style for brands under 30 styles/season

Weaknesses:

  • AI-generated specs may need manual refinement for highly complex garments (tailored blazers, technical outerwear)
  • Newer platform; smaller user community compared to Techpacker
  • Limited collaboration features (no multi-user editing)
  • Dependent on photo quality — blurry or poorly lit input images produce lower-quality results

Ideal user: Indie designers and small brands who need professional tech packs quickly without Illustrator skills or freelancer budgets.

Verdict: The strongest option for solo designers and small teams prioritizing speed and cost. The photo-to-tech-pack workflow is genuinely unique in the market. Review AI-generated specs carefully for complex garments.

2. Techpacker — Best for Team Collaboration {#techpacker}

How it works: Cloud-based platform with structured tech pack templates. You fill in specifications using a card-based interface, attach images, and export to PDF or Excel.

Pricing: $49/month (Starter), $99/month (Pro), $149/month (Business). Free trial available.

Strengths:

  • Industry standard for mid-size brands; trusted by 10,000+ companies
  • Strong collaboration features (multi-user access, commenting, version history)
  • Spec library — save and reuse specs across seasons
  • Integrations with PLM systems
  • Clean, professional PDF exports that factories are familiar with

Weaknesses:

  • Does not generate flat sketches — you still need to create these in Illustrator and upload them
  • Monthly subscription regardless of usage (not ideal for seasonal brands)
  • Learning curve for new users (1–2 weeks to get comfortable)
  • No AI assistance — every field is manually filled

Ideal user: Growing brands with 2+ team members who need structured collaboration and a growing spec library across seasons.

Verdict: The most mature and proven tech pack platform. Excellent for teams, but the lack of AI-assisted generation means it saves formatting time, not creation time. You still need Illustrator for flat sketches.

3. Adobe Illustrator + Excel — Best for Full Control {#adobe-illustrator}

How it works: Create flat sketches in Illustrator, build measurement charts and BOMs in Excel, compile into a PDF. This is the traditional industry-standard workflow used by technical designers at major brands.

Pricing: Adobe Illustrator: $23/month. Excel: included with Microsoft 365 ($7/month) or free via Google Sheets.

Strengths:

  • Complete creative control over every line, measurement, and layout
  • Industry-standard format — no factory will question an Illustrator-produced tech pack
  • No per-style costs (once you have the software)
  • Unlimited customization for any garment type
  • Thousands of tutorials, courses, and templates available

Weaknesses:

  • Steep learning curve — 2–6 months to produce factory-acceptable flat sketches
  • Time-intensive: 2–8 hours per style for experienced users
  • No built-in collaboration (manual file sharing, version control issues)
  • Requires knowledge of garment construction, grading, and manufacturing terminology
  • Easy to produce inconsistent formatting across styles

Ideal user: Technical designers with Illustrator proficiency, or brands willing to invest in learning the skill for long-term independence.

Verdict: Still the gold standard for quality and control. If you already know Illustrator and garment construction, this is the most powerful option. But the learning curve makes it impractical for most indie designers without technical training.

4. Techpack.co — Best Budget Template Tool {#techpackco}

How it works: Web-based tool with pre-built tech pack templates. Fill in fields for measurements, materials, and construction details. Upload your own flat sketches.

Pricing: $29/month (Basic), $59/month (Pro), $99/month (Business).

Strengths:

  • Lower price point than Techpacker
  • Simple, clean interface — easy to learn
  • Decent template library for common garment types
  • Good for brands producing simple garments (t-shirts, hoodies, basic dresses)

Weaknesses:

  • No flat sketch generation — you must create or source these externally
  • Limited customization compared to Illustrator or Techpacker
  • Smaller user community and less documentation
  • Templates can feel restrictive for complex or non-standard garments
  • Limited export options

Ideal user: Budget-conscious brands producing simple garments who want a structured format without the Techpacker price tag.

Verdict: A serviceable budget option for basic garments. Falls short for complex styles or brands that need sophisticated collaboration features.

Organized desk with tech pack design tools: laptop with flat sketches, Pantone guide, measurement tape, and printed specifications Organized desk with tech pack design tools: laptop with flat sketches, Pantone guide, measurement tape, and printed specifications

5. CLO 3D — Best for 3D Visualization {#clo-3d}

How it works: Full 3D garment simulation software. Create patterns, drape them on virtual models, and generate photorealistic 3D renders. Can export 2D flat sketches and measurement data.

Pricing: $50/month (Individual), $100/month (Business). Free 30-day trial.

Strengths:

  • Industry-leading 3D garment simulation
  • See how fabric drapes and fits before cutting a single sample
  • Can reduce physical sampling by 50–80%
  • Generates flat patterns that can be sent directly to factory
  • Growing adoption at major brands (Adidas, Hugo Boss, Tommy Hilfiger)

Weaknesses:

  • Not a dedicated tech pack tool — tech pack creation requires additional steps
  • Very steep learning curve (3–6 months to become productive)
  • Requires understanding of pattern making and fabric physics
  • Expensive for small brands when combined with other tools
  • Overkill for brands that don't need 3D prototyping

Ideal user: Brands that need 3D virtual sampling AND tech pack creation, and have team members with pattern-making expertise.

Verdict: A powerful tool for reducing physical samples, but not a direct tech pack solution. Best used in combination with a dedicated tech pack tool. The learning curve is the biggest barrier — this is professional-grade software.

6. Browzwear — Best for Enterprise {#browzwear}

How it works: Enterprise-grade 3D design and product development platform. Full PLM integration, digital twin creation, and collaborative design workflows.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing (typically $10,000–$50,000+/year per team).

Strengths:

  • Most comprehensive enterprise solution
  • Full integration with PLM systems (Centric, Flex PLM)
  • Used by global brands (Under Armour, Levi's, PVH)
  • Collaborative digital workflow from design to manufacturing
  • Advanced fabric simulation library

Weaknesses:

  • Prohibitively expensive for small and mid-size brands
  • Complex implementation (weeks to months)
  • Requires dedicated training and IT support
  • Not practical for brands under 100 styles per season

Ideal user: Large fashion enterprises with 100+ styles/season and dedicated technical design teams.

Verdict: Industry leader for enterprise fashion technology, but completely out of scope for indie brands and startups. Included here for completeness.

7. Free Templates — Best for Zero Budget {#free-templates}

How it works: Download free tech pack templates (typically Excel or PDF) and manually fill in your specifications. Sources include Maker's Row, fashion blogs, and design school resources.

Pricing: Free.

Strengths:

  • Zero cost
  • Good for learning the structure of a tech pack
  • Can produce acceptable results for very simple garments
  • No subscription commitment

Weaknesses:

  • You must create your own flat sketches (Illustrator, hand-drawn, or AI-generated)
  • Manual data entry for every field
  • No standardization — each template is formatted differently
  • No version control or collaboration features
  • Time-intensive: 3–8 hours per style including sketch creation
  • Output quality varies significantly

Ideal user: First-time designers who want to learn tech pack structure before investing in software, or brands with zero budget creating their first 1–2 tech packs.

Verdict: A learning tool, not a production tool. Acceptable for creating 1–3 tech packs to understand the process, but unsustainable for ongoing production.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison {#feature-comparison}

Feature Adstronaut AI Techpacker Illustrator Techpack.co CLO 3D
AI flat sketch generation Yes No No No No (3D only)
Auto BOM suggestions Yes No No No No
Graded size charts Yes Yes Manual Yes Partial
Team collaboration Limited Excellent No Basic Basic
Spec library No Yes Manual Limited No
PDF export Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
3D visualization No No No No Yes
No Illustrator needed Yes No* No No* No
Per-style cost (at 20 styles) $3–$5 $2.50–$7.50 $0 (time) $1.50–$5 N/A

*Techpacker and Techpack.co don't require Illustrator for data entry, but you still need it (or another tool) to create flat sketches to upload.

Which Tool Is Right for You? {#which-tool-is-right-for-you}

Your Situation Recommended Tool Why
Solo designer, < 15 styles/season, no Illustrator Adstronaut AI Fastest, cheapest, no skills needed
Team of 2+, 15–50 styles/season Techpacker Collaboration and spec library
Technical designer with Illustrator skills Illustrator + Excel Maximum control, zero per-style cost
Budget-constrained, simple garments Techpack.co or Free templates Lowest cost
Need 3D prototyping + tech packs CLO 3D + Techpacker 3D sampling + structured tech packs
Enterprise, 100+ styles/season Browzwear or Techpacker Business PLM integration, enterprise features

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best free tech pack software?

There is no fully free tech pack software that generates complete, factory-ready tech packs. The closest free options are: (1) Google Sheets or Excel with free downloadable tech pack templates from Maker's Row or fashion blogs, (2) Inkscape (free Illustrator alternative) for creating flat sketches, and (3) free trials from Adstronaut AI, Techpacker, or Techpack.co, which let you create 1–3 tech packs at no cost.

Do I really need tech pack software, or can I use Excel?

You can create a serviceable tech pack with Excel + Illustrator — many professional technical designers still do. Dedicated tech pack software mainly saves time on formatting, ensures consistency, and provides structured templates. If you produce fewer than 5 styles per season and have Illustrator skills, Excel may be sufficient. Beyond that volume, dedicated tools pay for themselves in time savings.

Can Techpacker generate flat sketches?

No. Techpacker is a tech pack management and formatting tool, not a design tool. You need to create flat sketches in Adobe Illustrator (or another vector editor) and upload them to Techpacker. Adstronaut AI is currently the only major tech pack tool that generates flat sketches automatically from product photos.

Is CLO 3D a tech pack tool?

CLO 3D is primarily a 3D garment design and simulation tool, not a dedicated tech pack platform. It can export flat patterns, measurement data, and 2D views that can be used in tech packs, but you typically need a separate tool (Techpacker, Excel) to compile the full tech pack document. Many brands use CLO 3D for design/prototyping and a separate tool for tech pack documentation.

How do I switch from Illustrator to tech pack software?

Most tech pack software accepts uploaded Illustrator files (.ai, .pdf, .png). The transition path is: (1) Keep creating flat sketches in Illustrator, (2) Use tech pack software for measurements, BOM, construction, and formatting, (3) Gradually adopt AI-generated sketches if quality meets your standards. You don't need to abandon Illustrator entirely — many brands use it alongside tech pack software.

Which tech pack software do manufacturers prefer?

Manufacturers care about the content of your tech pack, not which software created it. A well-organized PDF with clear flat sketches, complete measurements, detailed BOM, and construction specs will be accepted regardless of whether it came from Illustrator, Techpacker, Adstronaut AI, or Excel. That said, some factories appreciate standardized formats — ask your manufacturer if they have a preferred template.


Try Adstronaut AI — generate a complete tech pack in minutes


Sources and further reading: